Peer review: better than the alternatives.
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Internet Dilettantes' Crowd-Based Peer Review: An Exercise in Mediocrity
A suggestion has arisen that posits that a research article peer review process using a crowd-based online protected platform analysis compares favorably with conventional peer review, concluding that it is valid and workable. The suggestion appeared in an observational crowdbased online article filled with guesses, suppositions, and fantasy, justifying a free-for-all peer review. Debate on how...
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملThe Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process.
Anonymous peer review has served as the bedrock of research dissemination in scientific psychology for decades and has only sporadically been questioned. However, other disciplines, such as biomedicine and physics, have found the traditional peer-review system to be wanting and have begun to test and try alternative practices. In this article, we survey criticisms of the traditional peer-review...
متن کاملInvolving self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in a writing course: A cross comparison and reflection of students’ perceptions
The increasing demand for lifelong learners and reflective practitioners has re-conceptualized the connection between assessment and learning to the extent that alternative assessment methods (i.e., self-, peer and teacher-assessment, etc.) have emerged. However, their incorporation into various language skills might bring about certain consequences. Among them, the writing skill is ofte...
متن کاملPeer Assessment in evaluation of Medical sciences students
Introduction: Recently, peer assessment is especially noticed as a progress evaluation method. Although it is a known method, it is a novel method in many countries that they use traditional methods. Then the topic of current review article is peer assessment in medical education. Methods: The documents related to peer assessment, advantages, disadvantages, applications and how use it extracte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
دوره 40 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002